DHARMARAM COLLEGE,BANGALORE vs. ITO EXEMPTIONS WARD 1, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee is a religious organization and that the CIT(Exemptions) had also acknowledged its religious character. The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemptions) could have granted registration as a religious trust. The financial transactions were deemed to be a matter for the Assessing Officer during assessment.
What were the facts?
Dharmaram College applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The application was rejected by the CIT(Exemptions) who found the stated objects, actual activities, and financial patterns inconsistent and the genuineness of activities unproven. The assessee contended that it inadvertently mentioned charitable objects instead of religious ones.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AB was justified, considering the assessee's claim of being a religious institution despite inadvertently stating charitable objects in the application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions), Bengaluru dated 31/12/2025 vide DIN & Notice No: ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 26/1084269744(1) rejecting the application filed in Form-10AB dated 16/06/2025 for registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
General Ground 1.1. The order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as CIT(E), Bangalore) under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act to the extent prejudicial to the appellant is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 2 of 15
Rejection of Application filed for registration under section 12AB 2.1 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in rejecting the application
filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) for registration under section
12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.2 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in not properly
understanding the facts of the case, genuineness of religious
activities carried on by the appellant and the written
submissions along with various documentary evidences filed in
reply to hearing notice issued by the CIT(E), Bangalore.
2.3 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in concluding that the the
assessee has failed to establish a clear link between its stated
objects, its actual activities, financial pattern and therefore the
genuineness of the activities of the assessee cannot be
established on the basis of the material available on record.
2.4 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in denying registration
under section 12AB the claim for registration as a charitable
institution is contrary to its own stated position in view of the
assessee’s own admission regarding the religious nature of its
activities.
2.5 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in not appreciating that
the assessee is a religious organization with religious objects
carried on continuously and while filing the application for
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 3 of 15 registration under section 12AB, the nature of activities were
inadvertently stated to be charitable.
2.6 The learned CIT(E), Bangalore erred in concluding against the
appellant for various impugned reasons which were not
included in the show cause and for which no opportunity of
hearing was provided to the appellant.
2.7 On facts and circumstances of the case and law applicable, the
impugned order passed by the CIT(E), Bangalore rejecting the
application filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) for registration
under section 12AB is bad in law, liable to be quashed and the
appellant should be granted registration under section 12AB as
a religious organisation.
Prayer 3.1. In view of the above and other grounds to be adduced at the time of hearing, the appellant prays that the orders passed under section 12AB of the Act by the learned CIT(E), Bangalore to the extent prejudicial to the appellant be quashed or in the alternative the above grounds and the appeal be allowed.
The Appellant submits that each of the above grounds/ sub- grounds are independent and without prejudice to one another. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, vary, omit, substitute or amend the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or at, the time of hearing, of the appeal, so as to enable the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to decide the appeal according to law.
The appellant prays accordingly.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a society
registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960
vide registration No. 09/78-79. The assessee society was initially
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 4 of 15 granted registration under section 12A of the Act vide registration
number PRO.718/10A/Vol.AI/D.145 issued by the Commissioner
of Income Tax, Karnataka- II, Bangalore vide order dated 22.5.1980.
Subsequently, the assessee society was also granted registration
under sub clause (i) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A
of the Act vide Unique Registration Number (URN):
AAATD1013AE19801 dated 07/04/2022 effective from AY 2022-
23 to AY 2026-27. The assessee society is also registered under the
Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 vide Registration
Number 094420284 as a Religious Association. Thereafter, the
assessee trust filed an application in Form No 10AB for renewal of
registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act on 16.6.2025.
However, the contention of the assessee society is that while filing
the application for renewal in form 10AB on 16.06.2025, the
assessee trust inadvertently mentioned the object of the applicant
as “Relief of the Poor, Education, Medical relief & Advancement of
any other objects of general public utility” instead of “Religious”.
The ld. CIT(E), Bengaluru thereafter, vide notice dated 4.10.2025,
called for various details and documents. The AR of the assessee
appeared and filed submissions on 15.10.2025. Further, vide SCN
dated 27.10.2025, the CIT(E), Bangalore called upon the assessee
to show cause as to why the registration under the Act should not
be rejected for the reasons mentioned therein. The assessee
submitted its response on 23.12.2025 with the detailed
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 5 of 15 explanations to various issues raised by the ld. CIT (E) along with
various documents. The ld. CIT(E), Bangalore however passed the
order in Form No 10AD on 31.12.2025 and rejected the application
filed in Form-10AB dated 16.06.2025 for registration u/s.12AB of
the Act with the following observations which are reproduced below-
“7. The reply of the assessee has been carefully considered but is not found to be satisfactory. While the assessee has described its activities as religious in nature, it has failed to prove that the actual activities and financial transactions match with the objects stated in the Memorandum of Association. The assessee has itself admitted that it is not managing any formal educational institution, despite education being a key object. Further, no documentary evidence has been furnished to clearly establish how the substantial receipts from Christ University-associated institutions are applied towards the stated objects of the trust.
Similarly, the explanation regarding hostel-related collections remains unsubstantiated, as no approved fee structure, sanction letter or formal letter has been produced. The operation of additional activities such as coconut farm, music academy, language lab and publications has also not been supported by any approvals, beneficiary details or activity-wise financial statements to establish their charitable nature. The explanation regarding receipt of Rs. 21,06,000/- by way of multiple identical deposits has not been supported by documentary evidence as to why, in absence of any agreement with the Christ University, this amount is being transferred to the assessee.
Without prejudice to the above, it is also relevant to note that the assessee has itself admitted in its reply that it is engaged in religious activities, by stating that it is a religious institution functioning as a seminary for priests and that its purpose is imparting religious training to priests. Throughout the reply, the assessee has justified its activities by relying on constitutional provisions relating to freedom of religion and by emphasising its religious character. Having taken this stand, the assessee cannot, at the same time, seek registration by claiming that it is carrying on charitable activities. Therefore, the claim for registration as a charitable institution is contrary to its own stated position in view of the assessee’s own admission regarding the religious nature of its activities.
Considering the above facts, it is evident that the assessee has failed to establish a clear link between its stated objects and its
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 6 of 15 actual activities and financial pattern. The explanations offered are not supported by adequate documentary evidence. Therefore, the genuineness of the activities of the assessee cannot be established on the basis of the material available on record. In view of these facts and circumstances, the application of the assessee is liable to be rejected, as the assessee has failed to satisfy the conditions prescribed for grant of registration under u/s 12AB of the act. In view of the above, the application in Form-10AB dated 16.06.2025 for registration u/s.12AB vide section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) is therefore rejected.”
Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(E), Bangalore dated
31/12/2025, the assessee trust has filed the present appeal before
this Tribunal. The assessee has also filed a paper book comprising
147 pages containing therein various documents/record/report/
notes/financials/certificates/forms/notices/List of students relied
upon by the assessee in support of its case.
Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee contended that the ld.
CIT(E) has rejected the application for extraneous or irrelevant
reasons and the same is not in accordance with the provisions of
section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act. Further, the ld. AR of the assessee
argued that the genuineness of activities of the Trust as per section
12AB(1)(b) is established in the present case and hence the
assessee trust deserves the registration under section 12AB(1)(b) as
a religious trust. The renewal of registration under Foreign
Contribution (Regulation) Act as Religious Association was relied
upon to support the case of the assessee trust.
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 7 of 15 6. The ld. DR on the other hand relied on the order of the ld.
CIT(E) and justified the rejection of the application filed for the
registration.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the
materials available on record. The assessee is a major study house
of the Carmelites of Mary Immaculate (CMI) Congregation. As stated
by the AR of the assessee, it aims at educating people who are
prepared to commit themselves to the service of the Church and the
world, which is accomplished through a holistic, spiritual,
intellectual and cultural formation. It is a religious seminary
imparting religious education as deemed by its ecclesiastical
authority necessary for becoming priests or any other vocation in
the religious order of the Carmelites of Mary Immaculate. The
assessee society was granted registration under sub clause (i) of
clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act vide Unique
Registration Number (URN): AAATD1013AE19801 dated
07/04/2022 effective from AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. The assessee
society is also registered under the Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act, 2010 vide Registration Number 094420284 as a
Religious Association. Thereafter, the assessee trust filed an
application in Form No 10AB for renewal of registration under
section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act on 16.6.2025. Before proceeding
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 8 of 15 further, it is apposite here to take note of relevant section of the Act
for the purposes of this case which reads as under-
Procedure for fresh registration.
12AB. (1) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of an application made under clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,—
(a) …………..
(b) where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub- clause (iii) or sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) 94[or item (B) of sub- clause (vi)] of the said clause,—
(i) call for such documents or information from the trust or institution or make such inquiries as he thinks necessary in order to satisfy himself about—
(A) the genuineness of activities of the trust or institution; and
(B) the compliance of such requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust or institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects;
(ii) after satisfying himself about the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities under item (A) and compliance of the requirements under item (B), of sub-clause (i),—
(A) pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years; or
(B) if he is not so satisfied, pass an order in writing,--
(I) in a case referred to in sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub- clause (v) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A rejecting such application and also cancelling its registration;
(II) in a case referred to in sub-clause (iv) or in item (B) of sub- clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, rejecting such application, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard;
Thus, as per the above provisions, the ld. CIT(E) has to call for such
documents or information from the trust or institution or make
such inquiries as he/she thinks necessary in order to satisfy
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 9 of 15 himself/himself about (A) the genuineness of activities of the trust
or institution; and (B) the compliance of such requirements of any
other law for the time being in force by the trust or institution as
are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. We are of the
considered opinion that the ld. CIT(E) has to pass an order in
writing after satisfying himself/herself about three elements viz., (i) the objects of the trust or institution,
(ii) the genuineness of its activities under item (A) and (iii) Compliance of the requirements under item (B).
7.1 Further, at this relevant juncture, it is also apposite here to
take note of the objects of the trust as enumerated in Memorandum
of Association which are reproduced below for ease of reference &
convenience-
“III. The objects for which the society is established are :- (a) To promote education both religious and secular and charity
and for that purpose to take over the Dharmaram College at
Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore and run it as a religious,
charitable and educational institution as heretofore, by the
Fathers of the Congregation of the Carmelites of Mary
Immaculate, in trust, for the benefit of the student-member of
the said Congregation, during the period of their study of
Theology and other courses of studies that may be given or
provided there.
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 10 of 15 (b) To help an all-round development of Dharmaram College, more
importantly in the matter of inter-religious conferences and
discussions and setting up of libraries and archieves. (c) To enable students of other religious orders or congregations to
prosecute all or any of the aforesaid studies, afforded them
every facility for that purpose and to help retain the
individuality of every such religious order while its students
remain on the premises along with such of the members of their
order under whose charge they will be, to let them have a
separate residence in the precinct of the Dharmaram College on
which portions of land as may be allowed for that purpose. (d) To afford the same or such other facilities as may be deemed
proper to such others, irrespective of religion, caste or creed as
may be desirous of taking all or any of the courses of the
studies aforesaid. (e) For the above purposes, to take over and hold as trustees, all
the movable and immovable properties and other assets now or
may hereafter be held by Dharmaram College.”
Thus, the main objects of the assessee trust is to promote
education both religious & secular and for that purpose to take over
the Dharmaram College at Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore and run
it as a religious, charitable and educational institution. The
contentions of the assessee trust are that the objects although do
make a mention of running a charitable institution, the assessee
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 11 of 15 has not ventured into charity and remained as a religious
residential institution for Christian priests. We also take note of the
fact that the ld. CIT(E) has also noted the religious activities at para
9 of the rejection order by stating that “Without prejudice to the
above, it is also relevant to note that the assessee has itself admitted
in its reply that it is engaged in religious activities, by stating that it
is a religious institution functioning as a seminary for priests and
that its purpose is imparting religious training to priests.” The objects
of the assessee society are thus religious in nature. Further, we also
take note of the fact that the assessee trust is also granted
registration under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010
vide Registration Number 094420284 as a Religious Association.
7.2 Before us, the AR of the assessee vehemently contended that
while filing the application for renewal in form 10AB on 16.06.2025,
the assessee trust inadvertently mentioned the object of the
applicant as “Relief of the Poor, Education, Medical relief &
Advancement of any other objects of general public utility” instead
of “Religious”. However, when the Bench enquired about the status
of previous Registrations dated 22/05/1980 as well as
07/04/2022 i.e. whether those were granted as charitable
institution or religious institution, the ld. AR of the assessee
submitted that none of the registration certificate mentioned about
the granting of registration as a charitable entity or religious
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 12 of 15 institution. However, in the present case, the assessee has
explained in detail that it is a religious organization by way of the
submissions and details filed before the ld CIT(E) vide petition dated
23.12.2025. It is categorically stated therein that the assessee trust
has not changed its activities in fulfillment of its objectives from the
time of its inception. It has been a ‘Religious Seminary’ for the
priests of the Religious Order of the “Carmelites of Mary
Immaculate” from the date if its inception and continues to be the
same till date. The Carmelites of Mary Immaculate are a religious
order of the Christian Roman Catholic denomination. Religious
instruction and religious teachings pertinent to the denomination
and the religious order are conducted for persons who wished to be
priests in the religious order. It was with a vision to provide a
proper legal structure and regulate this activity; the assessee
society was formed to take over the Dharmaram College which was
the existing system of religious education that existed under the
religious order. The assessee is a residential institution for priests
and for those who desire to enter into the vocation of priesthood
and this is the main object which is been carried on by the assessee
society. In order to justify its religious activities with documentary
evidences, the assessee also submitted the complete list of students
studying the religious courses viz., Bachelor of Theology, Bachelor
of Philosophy, Diploma in Philosophy and Master in Philosophy. It
also submitted the appointment letters of Rector, Administrator and
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 13 of 15 others issued by the Prior General, Carmelites of Mary Immaculate.
It is also not in dispute that the renewal of registration of assessee
society under Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act is issued as a
Religious organization. The income and expenditure account
include expenses of religious nature like expenses on upkeep of
priests, students and religious functionaries, chapel maintenance,
contributions to various other religious institutes etc. It is thus
evident that the activities carried on by assessee society are
religious in nature. We are also of the considered opinion that the
ld. CIT(E) has also not brought on record any adverse material to
dispute the religious activities carried on by the assessee trust.
Further, we are also of the considered opinion that the financial
transactions such as hostel related collections, substantial receipts
from Christ University and associated institutions and its
application towards the religious objects of the assessee society is
the domain of the Assessing Officer to be examined during the
assessment stage. It has nothing to do with the genuineness of
activities of trust or institution. At the time of granting the
Registration, as stated earlier, the ld. CIT(E) has to satisfy
himself/herself about three elements viz., the objects of the trust or
institution, the genuineness of its activities under item (A) and
Compliance of the requirements under item (B). In our opinion, the
ld. CIT(E) having noted the religious character of the assessee trust,
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 14 of 15 could have granted registration as a religious trust instead of
rejecting the application.
7.3 We take note of the fact that though no application was made
for registration as a religious Trust as mentioned by the ld. CIT(E) &
the assessee before us contended that the same was an inadvertent
error, accordingly we deemed fit & proper to remit the entire issue
to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide afresh in accordance with law
by treating the application filed in form 10AB on 16/06/2025 for
registration as a Religious Trust. As we have already held the
assessee trust to be religious trust, the ld. CIT(E) has to satisfy
himself/herself about three elements viz., the objects of the trust or
institution, the genuineness of its activities under item (A) and
Compliance of the requirements under item (B) before granting
registration as a religious trust. Needless to say, reasonable
opportunity of being heard must be granted to the assessee. It is
ordered accordingly.
In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed
for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th May, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Maharishi) (Keshav Dubey) Vice President Judicial Member
Bangalore, Dated 19th May,2026. VG/SPS
ITA No.510/Bang/2026 Dharmaram College, Bengaluru Page 15 of 15
Copy to:
The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 5 Guard file
By order
Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026