TRDP HAPPY WORLD PVT LTD ,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCEL -19 , DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the approval obtained from the PCIT for issuing the Section 148 notices did not pertain to the assessees in question. Consequently, the notices were deemed bad in law and without jurisdiction.
What were the facts?
Notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act were issued to the assessees following a search operation. The assessees contended that these notices were issued without valid prior sanction from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the Section 148 notices due to the alleged lack of proper sanction from the PCIT as required by Section 151.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI BEFORE YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 6121/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2019-20) TRDP Happy World Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT 92, Chanderlok, Pitampura, Central Circle-19 New Delhi E-2ARA Centre, Jhandewalan PAN: AAGCA5382L Extension, Delhi
Appellant Respondent ITA No. 5755/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2021-22) Malwa Packaging Vs DCIT 36/1/2, Talawali Chand Near Central Circle-19 Panchwati, Colony, Indore Madhya E-2ARA Centre, Pradesh-452010 Jhandewalan Extension PAN: ABMFM6177H Delhi
Appellant Respondent ITA No. 7889/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2019-20) ITA No. 7998/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2021-22) Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs M/s TRDP Happy World Tax, Room No. 267, 2nd floor, E-2, Private Limited, 92, Jhandewalan Extension, ARA Chanderlok, Pitampura, Centre, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi PAN: AAGCA5328L Appellant Respondent ITA No. 7585/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2021-22) Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs M/s Malwa Packaging Tax, Room No. 267, 2nd floor, E-2, 36/1/2, Talwawti Chanda Jhandewalan Extension, ARA Near Panchwati Colony, Centre, New Delhi-110055 Indore, Madhya Pradesh PAN: ABMFM6177H Appellant Respondent
2 TRDP Happy World and Ors
ITA No. 6915/Del/2025 (A.Y. 2020-21) Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs Vidya Polymer Private Tax, Room No. 267, 2nd floor, E-2, Limited Jhandewalan Extension, ARA Plot No. 78, Block B Centre, New Delhi-110055 Wazirpur Industrial Area, Wazirpur IIIS.O. Wazirpur, North West, Delhi PAN: AACCV3141J Appellant Respondent Assessee by Sh. Amit Goel, CA & Sh. Pranav Yadav, Adv Revenue by Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Date of Hearing 24/03/2026 Date of Pronouncement 19/05/2026
ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned Appeals are filed by the respective Assessees’ and
the Revenue by challenging the respective orders of the Ld. CIT(A)
pertaining to Assessment Year 2019-20 to 2021-22.
Since a common issue is involved in all the above Appeals. The
appeals are heard together. In Ground No. 1 to 3 of Assessees’ Appeal in
ITA No. 6121/Del/2025, 5755/Del/2025 and in the application filed
under Rule 27 of ITAT Rule filed by the Assessee in ITA No.7998/D/2025
and 6915/Del/2025, Assessees have raised a legal issue challenging the
validity of issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 ('Act' for short).
3 TRDP Happy World and Ors
The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee vehemently submitted that the notice
u/s 148 of the Act has been issued without valid prior sanction u/s 151
of the Act and further submitted that the so-called approval of the PCIT
Central Bearing No. 6355 is not at all pertaining to the
Assessees/Appellant mentioned above. Thus, sought for allowing
Assessees’legal ground No. 1 to 3 in ITA No. 6121, 5755/Del/2025 is
also sought for allowing the application filed under Rule 27 of the Rules
filed by the Assessee in ITA No.7998/Del/2025 and 6915/Del/2025 and
also sought for allowing the Appeals of the Assessees and dismissal of
the Appeal of the Revenue.
Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that
prior sanction u/s 151 of the Act has been duly obtained before issuance
of notice u/s 148 of the Act and further by relying on the orders of the
Lower Authorities, sought for dismissing the contentions of the Ld.
Assessee's Representative.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available
on record. In the present case, a Search and seizure operation u/s 132
of the Act was carried out in the case of the assessees on 03/08/2022.
Notice dated 29/03/2023 u/s 148 of the Act was issued. As per the said
notice, the notice u/s 148 of the Act has been issued after obtaining
approval no. 6355 from PCIT (Central) Delhi. As could be seen from the
4 TRDP Happy World and Ors
said approval no. 6355 from PCIT (Central) Delhi, the said approval does
not pertain to any of the assessees who have filed the captioned Appeals.
For the sake of ready reference, one of such notice issued under section
148 issued by the AO is reproduced as under: -
It is evident that in the notices issued u/s 148, it has been stated
"The notice is being issued after obtaining the prior approval of the PCIT
(Central), Delhi - 2 has been accorded on date 24/03/2023 vide
Reference No. 6355".Further, it is observed that above approval
5 TRDP Happy World and Ors
reference No. 6355 taken to obtain sanction u/s 151 of the Act belongs
to different Assessee and not to the case of the present Assessees who
are under Appeal before us. The relevant portion sanction u/s 151 of
the Act of PCIT dated 24/03/2023 is reproduced below for ready
reference:
From the above extract of Sanction u/s 151 of the Act,it is evident
that in Para 7, the assessing officer has submitted the draft notices in t
the case of Tej Ram Dharam Paulbefore PCIT for A.Y. 2019-20 to A.Υ.
6 TRDP Happy World and Ors
2021-22. Thus, as on 24/03/2023 there was no sanction given by PCIT
for issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act against the Assessees herein.
We have also verified the notices issued in the case of other
Assessees mentioned above wherein Appeal in ITA No.
6121/Del/2025(TRDP Happy World Pvt. Ltd. A.Y 2021-22),
5756/Del/2025 (Malwa Packaging and 6916/Del/2025 (Vidya Polymer
(Rule 27 by the Assessee)) and found that identical notices have been
issued pursuant to mentioning the approval detail which is not at all
belongs to the respective Assessees.
In view of the above, we find merits in legal Assessees’ ground No.
1 to 3 in ITA No. 6121, 5755/Del/2025 and the application filed under
Rule 27 of the Rules filed by the Assessee in ITA No.7998/Del/2025 and
6915/Del/2025, as the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act itself
is bad in law and without jurisdiction the respective notices issued u/s
148 of the Act against the Assessee for the respective year under
consideration, the subsequent Assessment Orders passed are hereby
quashed. Accordingly, Assessees’ ground No. 1 to 3 in ITA No. 6121,
5755/Del/2025 and the application filed under Rule 27 of the Rules filed
by the Assessee in ITA No.7998/Del/2025 and 6915/Del/2025 are
allowed and the respective assessment orders for the respective year
under consideration are hereby quashed.
7 TRDP Happy World and Ors
Accordingly, Appeal of the Assessee in ITA No. 6121/Del/2025 (A.Y
2019-20) and ITA No. 5755/Del/2025 (A.Y 2021-22) are allowed.
Since, we have allowed the Assessees’ Appeal for Assessment Year
2019-20 and 2021-22, Revenue’s Appeal in ITA No. 7889/Del/2025 and
ITA No. 7585/Del/2025 are dismissed.
Since, we have allowed the application filed by the Assessee under
Rule 27 of the Rules in ITA No.7998/Del/2025 and 6915/Del/2025 and
quashed the assessment order, the Appeals of the Revenue render in-
fructuous. Accordingly, Revenue’s Appeal in ITA No.7998/Del/2025 and
6915/Del/2025 are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th May, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (YOGESH KUMAR U.S.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:- 19.05.2026 Reshma Naheed, Sr.P.S Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI
8 TRDP Happy World and Ors
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026