ITO-1(4) INDORE, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. VIDIT BANSAL, CHITAVAD RAOD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that CBDT Circular No. 09/2024, which increased the monetary limit for filing appeals by the Department to the Tribunal to Rs. 60,00,000/-, is binding on the Revenue. Since the tax effect was below this limit, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which deleted an addition related to income from other sources. The tax effect of the appeal was less than Rs. 60,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the revised monetary limit stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 09/2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shree Paresh M. Joshi
Per Bench:
Captioned appeal filed by Revenue, pertaining to Assessment Year 2024-25, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 16.01.2026, which in turn arises out of an order passed by Assessing Officer u/s. 154 of the Act. Vidit Bansal
In this revenue’s appeal in ITA No. 245/IND/2026, we have noticed that revenue has raised g
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026