UJJAIN SAHAKARI DUGDH SANGH MARYADIT,UJJAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2 (1) UJJAIN, UJJAIN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's total income would be NIL even after considering the adhoc disallowance, due to the deduction available under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from cooperative banks. Therefore, the disallowance was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, had certain expenses for which bills/vouchers were not provided to the AO. The AO made an adhoc disallowance, which was reduced by the CIT(A). The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the adhoc disallowance of expenses was justified when the assessee was eligible for a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) that would render the total income NIL.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI Dr. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT & MEMBER SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
PER Dr. MANISH BORAD, A.M: This appeal of Assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2013-14 is directed against the order of Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 14.08.2025 which is arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act’) framed on 30.03.2016 by ITO-2(1), Ujjain.
ITA No. 858 of 2025
The only issue involved in the present appeal raised is against adhoc disallowance of expenses @10% at Rs.1,58,192/-.
Facts, in brief, are that the assessee is a cooperative society engaged in the business of selling milk and milk products. Return of income for AY 2013-14 filed on 30.9.2013 declaring NIL income, picked up for scrutin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026