BHARAT DUDHABHAI PURABIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, INCOMETAX OFFICE, VEJALPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee received compensation under BSNL VRS-2019, inadvertently offered it to tax, and later sought exemption under Section 10(10B) in appeal. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as time-barred and refused to condone the delay.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that appellate authorities can entertain fresh claims and condoned the delay in filing the appeal, allowing exemption under Section 10(10B) for the BSNL VRS compensation. However, an additional ground regarding leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA) was dismissed as the relevant notification was not applicable to the assessment years.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal as time-barred and refusing to condone the delay for a claim of exemption under Section 10(10B) for VRS compensation. Whether an additional ground regarding leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA) is admissible for the relevant assessment years.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(10B),Section 10(10AA),Section 143(1),Section 250,Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
These are two appeals filed by the same Assessee against two separate Orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal ADDL/JCIT(A) - Chennai [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] for the Assessment Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. Since the issues involved in both the appeals are common and arise from the same factual matrix identical, both the appeal were heard together and are therefore, being disposed off by way of a common order.
We would first take up ITA No.660/AHD
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026