SHRIRAM NAMDEO KAKRALE,DINDORI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NASHIK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the assessee was non-responsive, the CIT(A)/NFAC had not adjudicated the issues on merit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the case was restored to the CIT(A)/NFAC for one final opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an individual, did not file a return of income. The Assessing Officer, upon receiving information about substantial financial transactions, reopened the assessment and made additions for cash deposits and interest income. The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A)/NFAC despite multiple opportunities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC erred by dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution without adjudicating the issues on merit, and whether the assessee should be granted a final opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 69A,Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2. 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘SMC’ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, //True Copy // Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
5 ITA No.495/PUN/2026 Shriram Namdeo Kakrale
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 24.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 24.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before 24.06.2026 3 JM/AM the Second Member Draft discussed/approved by 24.06.2026 4 AM/AM Second Member Approved Draft comes to the 24.06.2026 5 Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on 24.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to 9 the Office Superintendent Date on which file goes to the 10 A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026