PRADEEP KUMAR JINDAL,DELHI vs. ACIT CC-25, DELHI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.8497 & 8498/Del/2025 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sh. Pradeep Kumar Jindal, Vs. ACIT, H-1/1A, Model Town-3, Central Circle-25, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AAIPJ8526A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Rajiv Kumar Khandelwal, CA Sh. Jaind Kumar Jaiswal, Adv. Department by Sh. Rajesh Chandra, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 20.05.2026 Date of pronouncement 20.05.2026 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee’s twin appeals ITA Nos.8497 & 8498/Del/2025 for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -29 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s orders, both dated 07.05.2024 having DINs and orders no. CIT(A), Delhi-29 10392/2013-14 and 10562/2014- 15, involving proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), respectively.

ITA Nos.8497 & 8498/Del/2025

Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2 For the reasons stated in the assessee’s condonation averments, delays of 504 days in filing of both the instant appeals are condoned in light of Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC). 3. It next emerges with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the appellant herein Mr. Archit Jindal claims himself to be the “legal representative” of the assessee Late Sh. Pradeep Kumar Jindal, who is stated to have left for his heavenly abode on 12.04.2025. Faced with this situation, we note that there is no even an iota of indication in the appellant’s submissions that either he has succeeded to the estate of the deceased or he is managing the same or as an intermeddler thereof; as the case may be, as per section 2(29) of the Act r.w.s. 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 defining such a “legal representative” in very terms. There is further no material on record that the appellant herein has been proceeded against by the department under section 159 of the Act. 3. That being the case, we find no merit in the appellant’s claim as “legal representative” of the deceased assessee and reject his

2 | P a g e

ITA Nos.8497 & 8498/Del/2025

instant appeals at this stage in very terms, subject to a rider that he shall be at liberty to file a fresh appeal as and when he either satisfies the statutory conditions of a “legal representative” under section 2(11) (supra) or he is proceeded against by the department under section 159 of the Act, whichever is earlier. Ordered accordingly. 4. These assessee/appellant’s twin appeals ITA Nos.8497 & 8498/Del/2025 are dismissed as premature at this stage in above terms subject to all just exceptions. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order pronounced in the open court on 20th May, 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 21st May, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

3 | P a g e