MAX CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 16(1), GHAZIABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were against assessment orders passed under section 153C read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The primary challenge was to the validity of the approval granted under section 153D, which the assessee argued was not in accordance with the law.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval granted under section 153D was mechanical and lacked proper application of mind by the approving authority. It found that the approval was granted in a formal manner without due consideration of the seized documents and appraisal reports.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the approval granted by the Joint CIT under section 153D for framing search assessments was valid, considering it appeared to be a mechanical exercise without due application of mind.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153D,Section 153C,Section 143(3),Section 271(1)(c),Section 271AAB,Section 292BC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA&
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the common order
of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3 (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) in CIT(Appeals)
Kanpur-4/11505/16-17 & CIT(Appeals) Kanpur-4/11564/16-17 arising out of the common order dated 30.12.2016 u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 64/CTK/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026