SHRI VILEPARLE GHOGHARI VISHA SHREEMALI JAIN SAMAJ,VILE PARLE WEST, MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTIONS, CUMBLLA HILL, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3815/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 June 2026AY 2026-273 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption) in the interest of justice. The assessee was directed to furnish all required documents and participate in the proceedings for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for renewal of registration under Section 12A was disallowed by the CIT(Exemption) for non-compliance with a notice and failure to furnish requisite documents. The assessee later submitted a paper book with the relevant documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in disallowing the renewal of registration without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee to furnish documents.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E’ BENCH

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWALShri Vileparle Ghoghari

For Respondent: Smt. Amrita Singh, CIT DR
Hearing: 24/06/2026Pronounced: 24/06/2026

आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against order dated 25.02.2026 passed by CIT (Exemption), Mumbai wherein, ld. CIT(E) has disallowed the renewal of Registration u/s.12A on the

2 ITA No.3815/Mum/2026 Shri Vileparle Ghoghari Vishashrimali Jain Samaj ground that assessee had not complied with the notice dated 31/01/2026.

2.

From a perusal of the order, it is seen that the learned CIT(E), upon verification of the application filed in Form No. 10AB, found that the application had not been duly complied with and that the requisite documents required for processing the application had not been furnished by the assessee. Despite service of notice, the assessee failed to furnish the requisite details and documents.

3.

Before us, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has now filed a paper book containing the relevant documents. Since the impugned order has been passed ex parte without the assessee furnishing the requisite details and documents, we deem it fit, in the interest of justice, to restore the matter to the file of the learned CIT(E). The assessee is directed to furnish all the documents and details as may be required and to participate in the proceedings. The learned CIT(E), after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, shall adjudicate the matter afresh in accordance with law.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 24th June, 2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (GIRISH AGRAWAL) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 24/06/2026 KARUNA, sr.ps

3 ITA No.3815/Mum/2026 Shri Vileparle Ghoghari Vishashrimali Jain Samaj Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,

(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →