PRIYA NISHANT SHETH,SURAT vs. N SAIRAJ, ASST.DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) in the interest of justice, noting that the assessee was not given an opportunity to be heard regarding the delay. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on its merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partner in a firm, reported profit from the firm which was claimed as exempt under Section 10(2A). However, the Assessing Officer treated this profit as taxable business income in the intimation under Section 143(1). The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a significant delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without granting an opportunity of hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A) [in short “CIT(A)”], Guwahati dated 16.02.2026 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2020-21. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned ADIT has grossly erred in treating the profit of Rs.15,91,475/- received from the partnership firm, which is specifically exempt u/s 10(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as taxable business income of the appellant and wrongly adding the same under the head "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession (PGBP)".
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(2A)
- Dineshbhai Maganbhai Butani, Surat vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1131/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Anilkumar Bhikhabhai Virani, Bhavnagar vs DCIT, Circle-1, BhavnagarITA 2343/AHD/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Aditya Singhania, KolkataITA 454/KOL/2026[2018]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026
- DCIT-CC-4(2), Mumbai vs Birla Group Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 988/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Nareshkumar Punjiram Patel, Ahmedabad vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-3(1)(1) Previously…ITA 2079/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026