SAMIR,UJJAIN vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) as sufficient cause was shown. However, due to the assessment order being ex-parte under Section 144 and notices being sent to a wrong address, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to a 299-day delay in filing. The assessee claimed the delay was due to notices being sent to an incorrect address and his lack of literacy and digital awareness. The ITAT noted that the assessment order was passed under Section 144 after the assessee failed to comply with notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the first appeal before the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained, and whether the ex-parte assessment order passed under Section 144 should be set aside and remanded due to improper service of notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of convenience & brevity] before this tribunal, as & by way of a second appeal .The Assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-
26/1081507253(1), dated 07.10.2025 which is herein after
referred to as the “Impugned order”. The Relevant
Samir ITA No. 990/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2019-20
Assessment year is 2019-20 and the corresponding previous
year period is from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2019
Factual Matrix
1 That as & by way of an Assessment order made u/s 147
r.w.s 144/144B of the Act, the total
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026