KHALID MOHD. KHAN,VILLAGE CHHAN, POST MISROD, BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(3) BHOPAL, AAYKAR BHAWAN BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the notice under Section 148 was issued on April 1, 2021, the reassessment proceedings were governed by the substituted provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. Compliance with Section 148A was a mandatory condition precedent. As the AO failed to follow this procedure, the notice was void ab initio, and the consequent assessment was unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessee's case for AY 2013-14 and issued a notice under Section 148. Although the notice was dated March 31, 2021, it was dispatched and delivered to the assessee on April 1, 2021. The AO did not follow the mandatory procedure under Section 148A before issuing the notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing a notice under Section 148 on April 1, 2021, without following the mandatory procedure under Section 148A, are valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 115BBE,Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first appeal dated 02.12.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 30.03.2022 passed by learned National Faceless Assessment Centre [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 & 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2013-14, the assessee has filed this appeal.
Khalid Mohd. Khan ITA No. 1084/Ind/2025 – AY 2013-14
The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the assessee-individual filed his return of income of AY 2013-14 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,40,440/- u/s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026