INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITARSI vs. SHYAM SUNDER BHARGAVA, PIPARIYA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the sole ground of the revenue's appeal was resolved by the rectification order of the CIT(A), which explained the difference between bank credits and turnover as unsecured loans and advances.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made an addition of approximately Rs. 636.76 crores to the assessee's income. The CIT(A) initially dismissed the assessee's appeal but later passed a rectification order.
What were the issues?
Whether the difference between bank credits/debits and turnover remained unexplained, and if the CIT(A)'s rectification order resolved the revenue's grievance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 144B,Section 250,Section 253,Section 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M JOSHI
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Revenue under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961, [hereinafter referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as and by way of an appeal. The revenue is aggrieved by the order bearing No:-
ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/106958934(1) dated
2024 passed by the Ld. CIT (A) u/s 250 of the Act,
which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Order”.
The Relevant Assessment year is 2015-16 and the SHYAM SUNDER BHARGAVA ITA No. 858/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2015-16
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2014 to 31.03.2015. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an assessment order made u/s 147 rws 144/144B of the act, the to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026