RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, NFAC, DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, with the appeal for AY 2016-17 being filed with a delay. The assessee sought condonation of delay due to pandemic-related lockdowns and ITAT office closure, which was granted.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal for AY 2016-17. The issue regarding advertisement, marketing, and promotion (AMP) expenditure and dividend payment to non-resident shareholders was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned, and the treatment of AMP expenditure and dividend payments to non-resident shareholders in light of DTAA provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B),Section 253(3),Section 115JB,Section 92C,Section 234C,Section 270
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'AO') passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with sections 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18 dated 30.03.2021 & 27.01.2022, respectively.
1 The Registry has informed that the appeal for A.Y. 2016-17 is barred by limitation by 41 days. The assessee has filed a petition dated 24.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026