ASEEM KUMAR GUPTA,DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-9, DELHI
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) sought a common approval under Section 153D for multiple assessment years (2004-05 to 2010-11) and for multiple assessees. This common approval was granted by the Additional CIT on a single date without apparent application of mind.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a common approval granted mechanically for multiple assessment years and assessees under Section 153D vitiates the entire assessment. The amendment to Section 292BC, which validates defective approvals, is not applicable as the approval was granted prior to its effective date.
What were the issues?
Whether a common approval granted under Section 153D for multiple assessment years and assessees, without application of mind, renders the assessment invalid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR KUAMR & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER BENCH : The captioned seven appeals are filed by the Assessee against the separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”), all dated 26.11.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) arising out of separate assessment orders, passed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2010-11. 2. The issues involved in all captioned appeals are interlinked, therefore, they have been heard together and accordingly, adjudicated by this common order.
First, we take assessee’s appeal in ITA No. 687/Del/2026 for AY 2004-05 wherein, the assessee has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 64/CTK/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026