CHHATTISGARH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid because the AO's reasons for reopening did not match the additions made. The discrepancy between the income escaping assessment mentioned in the reasons and the actual additions made rendered the AO's satisfaction ambiguous and the notice under Section 148 void ab initio.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) issued reassessment notices based on reasons indicating certain incomes escaped assessment. However, during reassessment, the AO made additions on entirely different grounds and amounts than those specified in the reasons recorded. The assessee argued that this discrepancy vitiated the reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings are valid when additions made by the AO differ significantly from the income escaping assessment stated in the reasons recorded for reopening.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.333, 334 & 335/RPR/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road-1, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.)-492 006 PAN: AABCM6288N
........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.353, 354, 355 & 356/RPR/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)
........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/s.
2 Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited ITA Nos.333 to 335/RPR/2025 ITA Nos.353 to 356/RPR/2025 Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited Ground Floor, LIC Campus, Pandri, Ravigram, S.O-Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 PAN: AABCM6288N
……""यथ" / Respondent
Assessee by : Shri R.B Doshi, CA Revenue by : Ms. Manisha Kinnu, CIT-DR
सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026