INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI vs. M/S STAR BUILDERS DEVELOPERS, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) to admit and decide the assessee's additional grounds of appeal challenging the validity of the re-opening of assessment.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of INR 2,86,79,000/- on account of unexplained capital introduced. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, confirming an addition of INR 31,49,500/- and deleting the rest.
What were the issues?
Whether the re-opening of assessment was valid and whether the additional grounds challenging it should be admitted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6295/Del/2025 [Assessment Year : 2012-13] Star Builders & vs ITO Developers, 205 A-02, Ward-58(1) Guru Nanak Pura, Laxmi New Delhi Nagar, New Delhi-110092 PAN-AAJAS4843D APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA No.5966/Del/2025 [Assessment Year : 2012-13] ITO vs Star Builders & Developers, Room No.315, 205 A-02, Guru Nanak D-Block, Vikas Pura, Laxmi Nagar, New Bhawan, Delhi-110092 PAN-AAJAS4843D New Delhi APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by Shri Anurag Sinha, Adv. Revenue by Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 26.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement 22.05.2026
ORDER PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The captioned cross-appeals are filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the order dated 07.08.2025 by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), NFAC, Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the
ITA No.6295 & 5966/Del/2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising out of assessment order dated 29.12.2019 passed u/s 147/143(3) of the Act pertaining to Assessment Year 2012-13.
Since the appeal filed by the Revenue and Cross-objection filed by the assessee having common and similar issues therefore, both are decided by a common order for the sake of convenience.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a company and filed its return of income, declaring NIL income. The AO has information that the assessee has undertaken cash transaction of INR 3.40 crores and accordingly, the case of the assessee was re- opened by issue of notice u/s 148 of the Act. Thereafter, the re- assessment order was passed wherein total addition of INR 2,86,79,000/- was made by holding that the assessee has received fresh capital of INR 8,55,79,000/- from various persons out of which the source of Rs. 2,86,79,000/- remained unexplained. After considering the submissions, the AO has made the addition of INR 2,86,79,000/- being capital introduced and remained unverified.
Against the said order, the assessee filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order dated 07.08.2025 has partly allowed the appeal of the assessee wherein the addition to the extent of INR 31,49,500/- was confirmed and balance addition was deleted after considering the submissions of the assessee.
ITA No.6295 & 5966/Del/2025
Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(A), both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal by taking various Grounds of appeal mentioned in the appeal memo.
The assessee in Ground of appeal Nos. 1 to 4 has challenged the re-opening of the assessment.
Heard the contentions of both the parties at length and perused the material available on record. It was the submission of Ld.AR that during the course of appellate proceedings, the assessee has raised additional Grounds of appeal wherein the validity of re-opening of the assessment was challenged and for this, he drew our attention to page 146 and onwards of the Paper book wherein the assessee has raised additional Grounds of appeal regarding re-opening of assessment and made a request for the admission of the same before the ld. CIT(A).
The AO has further placed reliance on the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC reported in 229 ITR 382 (SC) for the admission of the additional grounds of appeal. However, from the perusal of the order of Ld. CIT(A), it is observed that there is no whisper about the additional Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee, challenging the legality of the re-opening of assessment.
ITA No.6295 & 5966/Del/2025
In view of these facts, we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to the file of Ld.CIT(A) with the directions to admit assessee’s additional Grounds of appeal taken on the re- opening of the assessment and decide the same in accordance with law.
Since we have allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, the other grounds of appeal taken by both the parties on merits are become academic.
In the, appeal of the assessee in ITA No.6295/Del/2025 for Assessment Year 2012-13 is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the Revenue in ITA No.5966/Del/2025 for Assessment Year 2012-13 is also allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 22.05.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANUBHAV SHARMA) (MANISH AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Date:-22.05.2026 *Amit Kumar, Sr.P.S* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT 6. Guard File ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI Page | 4
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026