SHRI. CHANDRA KANT SEN,SAGAR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KATNI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 115BBE, which increased the tax rate, came into effect after the date of the survey. Therefore, the higher tax rate could not be applied retrospectively to the income surrendered before the amendment.
What were the facts?
An Income Tax survey was conducted on the assessee on September 22, 2016, during which the assessee surrendered Rs. 9,18,739. The Assessing Officer initially completed the assessment accepting the return and applied a tax rate of 30% on the surrendered amount. Subsequently, the AO passed a rectification order under Section 154, applying a higher tax rate of 77.25% as per Section 115BBE.
What were the issues?
Whether the enhanced tax rate under Section 115BBE, amended subsequently, can be applied retrospectively to income surrendered during a survey conducted before the amendment's effective date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 20.01.2025 pertaining to the assessment year 2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of case the tax demand made is patently wrong and unwarranted. That the Income Tax survey u/s 133A of the IT Act was conducted on 22.09.2016 and the assessee has surrendered Rs. 9,18,739/-. That the order u/s 143(3) sated was passed on 30.06.2019 by accepting the ROI of ssessee at Rs. 15,07,340/- and t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBE
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026