MOHAMMAD MATIN,RANCHI vs. COMMISSIONER, RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present evidence. A cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on the assessee for non-cooperation.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A) for non-compliance and failure to produce evidence. The assessee claimed notices were not served and a sale deed was cancelled due to non-receipt of consideration, thus no taxable transfer occurred.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without proper service of notice and opportunity to be heard, and whether a capital gain arose from a disputed sale transaction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI SONJAY SARMA & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, A.M.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 24/09/2025 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
Notices were never served Ex parte order illegal: The CIT(A) erred in holding that notices were duly served, whereas no notice was ever received through email, or by post at the registered address. Hence the ex-parte dismissal violates section 282 of services of notices generally. My official email id is officesupper445@g
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026