ANIL KUMAR SINGH,HARDOI, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO, HARDOI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to consider the assessee's audit report while making a best judgment assessment, rendering the additions arbitrary. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file an income tax return for AY 2020-21 due to COVID-19 related hardships and communication issues. The Assessing Officer completed a best judgment assessment, making additions based on GSTR-3B turnover and unexplained cash deposits. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the best judgment assessment was valid without considering the assessee's audit report and whether the assessee was denied natural justice due to non-service of notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 69A,Section 271A,Section 271B,Section 270A,Section 271AAC,Section 272A(1)(d),Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, wherein the ld. CIT(A) vide his order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act dated 22.08.2025 has dismissed the appeal of the assessee against the order passed by the ld. AO under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2020-21 on 13.02.2025. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. Non-Filing of Return Due to COVID-19 Hardship The appellant was unable to file the return of income for AY 2020-21 due to being quarantined during the COVID-19 pandemic, which restricted access to digital infrastructure and prevented authentication via Digital Signature Certificate.
The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026