MANOJ GUPTA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 2(1)(1), AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal. While acknowledging the assessee's non-cooperative conduct, the Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits to ensure principles of natural justice are followed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a second appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 161 days due to the father of their counsel undergoing cancer treatment. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte, confirming additions of Rs. 8,45,000/- and Rs. 12,12,701/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adhering to principles of natural justice, and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (SMC
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, J.M.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.10.2025 passed in appeal No NFAC/2016-17/10274923 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2017-18, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal ex-parte, confirming the additions of Rs. 8,45,000/- as undisclosed income and Rs. 12,12,701/- as unexplained cash credit made vide assessment order dated 24.05.2023 passed u/s 147 of the Act.
At the very outset, we notice that, according to registry’s report, the assessee filed this second appeal on 10.06.2026 against
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026