MANOJ GUPTA,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 2(1)(1), AGRA

ITA 517/AGR/2026Status: HeardITAT Agra31 August 2026AY 2017-20183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal. While acknowledging the assessee's non-cooperative conduct, the Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits to ensure principles of natural justice are followed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a second appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 161 days due to the father of their counsel undergoing cancer treatment. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte, confirming additions of Rs. 8,45,000/- and Rs. 12,12,701/-.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adhering to principles of natural justice, and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (SMC

Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

For Appellant: Shri Anurag Sinha, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr (DR)
Hearing: 31.08.2026Pronounced: 31.08.2026

PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, J.M.

This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.10.2025 passed in appeal No NFAC/2016-17/10274923 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2017-18, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal ex-parte, confirming the additions of Rs. 8,45,000/- as undisclosed income and Rs. 12,12,701/- as unexplained cash credit made vide assessment order dated 24.05.2023 passed u/s 147 of the Act.

2.

At the very outset, we notice that, according to registry’s report, the assessee filed this second appeal on 10.06.2026 against

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →