INDRA PRAKASH EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY ,FARRUKHABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that procedural law is meant to advance justice and technicalities should not override substantial justice. It noted that the CBDT circular allows for condonation of delay in such cases.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, belatedly. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application solely on the ground of delay, without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the application for approval under Section 80G on technical grounds of delay without providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA(DB
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGHBRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER:SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.03.2026 passed in appeal No CIT (Exemption), Lucknow/2025-26/12AA/25708 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Lucknow, (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(E) under second proviso to clause (ii)(b)(B) of section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), wherein ld CIT(E) has rejected assessee’s application for approval on the ground of having been filed belatedly.
The facts in brief are that the appellant assessee filed an online application in Form 10AB under clause (ii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section u
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026