PROF. DR. SOHAN RAJ- LAXMI DEVI, TATER CHERITABLE TRUST,JODHPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E)'s conclusions regarding commerciality and religious activity were based on assumptions and required further factual verification. The rejection of the 80G application was also linked to the 12AB rejection.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G. The CIT(E) rejected both applications, citing commercial activities like monetized YouTube channels and religious propagation as reasons for ineligibility.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust's activities, including video production and broadcasting, constitute charitable purposes under Section 2(15) and if they disqualify it from registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH JODHPUR
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM: These two appeals filed by the assessee, Prof. Dr. Sohan Raj-Laxmi Devi, Tater Charitable Trust, Jodhpur, arise from two separate orders dated 14.11.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(E)"]. Since both appeals pertain to the Prof. Dr. Sohan Raj – Laxmi Devi, Tater Cheritable Trust same assessee, arise from the same set of facts and involve interconnected issues concerning registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G(5) of the Income
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026