MATA GURMAIL KAUR CHARITABLE TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in rejecting the registration application solely on the ground of no activities in the preceding three years. The focus at the registration stage should be on the objects of the trust and a prima facie satisfaction of genuineness, not the quantum of past activities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Mata Gurmail Kaur Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application, citing that no charitable activities were carried out in the preceding three years.
What were the issues?
Whether denial of registration under Section 12AB is justified solely due to absence of charitable activities in preceding years. Whether the CIT correctly applied the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 at the stage of registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT (E), Chandigarh, dated 19/11/2025, rejecting the application for registration dated 26/08/2025, filed by the assessee in Form 10AB, u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act 1961( henceforth the Act ).
The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in the memorandum of appeal in form 36 are as follows:
“1. That the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT (Exemptions), Chandigarh rejecting the application for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)/12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and bad in law.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026