RAMANA,PHILLAUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition based on Annexure A-22, which pertained to the assessee's husband's business entities, was unsustainable. It also found that the presumption under Section 292C was rebutted by evidence indicating the entities belonged to the husband. The disallowance for non-deduction of TDS was also questioned when books were rejected.
What were the facts?
During a survey, various documents were impounded from the assessee's business premises. The Assessing Officer (AO) made significant additions to the income based on these documents, including alleged undisclosed turnover and unexplained investments.
What were the issues?
Whether additions based on documents pertaining to a spouse's business are valid, and if disallowances can be made after rejecting books of account.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 115BBE,Section 68,Section 69B,Section 292C,Section 133A,Section 143(3),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM:
I.T.A. No.440/Asr/2025 ( Assessee appeal), Asst Year : 2016-17 .
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBE
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026