JATINDER KUMAR MAGOTRA,JAMMU KASHMIR vs. ITO, JAMMU, JAMMU

ITA 262/ASR/2025Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 August 2026AY 2012-136 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the matter should be remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication. The AO needs to consider the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee to correct any errors.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed their return late, and the Assessing Officer (AO) added unexplained cash credits to the total income. The assessee submitted explanations and evidence, but the AO proceeded with the assessment.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO correctly added unexplained cash credits without properly considering the assessee's submissions and evidence. Whether the penalty for non-compliance with notices was justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 271(1)(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IUDICIALMEMBf,R

f-s ldt,d., K* M.gd.q 46 Seer.6,Chmillimma. (aDDelent) t(Pstcdd'l I

r96t,l tkn.4drh the td I datd t6ar]o.l Dclhi.p'skduk250ofrhcrl ^d, fL1r. r4 2s.d ua l47n4.fdF14d 1 codo"eibn ot Detav Inis Twerl k beh.nly filed by 23 ( r{ery fiF divs ) YhhHrheNsseh6erpL Ltdvide //'

Eaipb Therams bcjnc s,isirdo4

I bkci n ro.n 16 {hi.hrl.esroonryone rsueoraddiiionorir./0r: Jrrl onacoudof urexplainedc6hdetssibin binr unon@rd'p@.dirys*fti'''ld!id. trobe u^ 113 daEd ?e/0rr0 r r ( ,r /r, p,4 ldrfe ) . r. IixbsnceofiiJ- conprhic.oj nrpdr. b) rhcass$er rsued bt !'e Ao j rhe asssncd w3 r0,42,r l0/, o, econmofuicrplsined.ah d.posns jnbak

I hrs been rcprc$ded by Lfikn subnissidm \ltrhheh6d.posiren ]nhi5 baf (,.c dn'ned pmtu on fte sid B.ip6 @ s7. ( eiehr ltrmcge ). s rheLd6in$pelarea horir,v htr a[d\€d vids heariig 10 rhe a*!s3nd i6 .oi.d rhe *jsFm. orrDs n fte ndd orrh. as*sre ( ii rhe ponai) oe @ panry hj iD sbfnceoran),.videik otr,<!4. R ol the dsse liled .$h book 8lotrg wirh $dhen s'bmnsionsexplaioingdde w

dE crl' 6. rhe Ld DR relied on rhc o'd.. or rhe Ld clr ( A ) and abmnidl 'l!r rhe 96* Eccip6 .otrdr.d b fte-IDs als ne{b Eifidio bdfi.aok-r. 7. we hrve hear,l dre rival 5ubftnsio

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →