M/S. HIND SAMACHAR LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection of book results was not justified as no specific defects were pointed out. The addition on account of stock was partly allowed, reducing the addition. Additions under Section 40A(3) and for prior period expenses were deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which upheld the AO's additions. The grounds of appeal included rejection of book results, addition on account of stock discrepancy, disallowance under Section 40A(3), and additions for prior period expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of book results was justified without specific defects, and whether additions on account of stock, Section 40A(3) payments, and prior period expenses were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM:
The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT(A), Jallandhar passed u/s 250 of the Act ‘61 dated 29.09.2011, which has arisen out of the AO Range – III, Jalandhar, order dated 16/08/2007 passed u/s 143(3). Assessment Year: 2004-05 2
Grounds 1 and 1(b) : In course of hearing the Ld AR of the assessee has withdrawn grounds of appeal No 1 and 1(b) ( as contained in form 36 ) and as such the same is dismissed as not pressed .
Ground No 2: Rejection of book results u/s 145 without finding any defects.
The Ld AR of the assessee su
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 145
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6507/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6506/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Mintu Lal, Ranchi vs Assessing Officer, RanchiITA 140/RAN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ontic Finserve Limited, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward -3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1924/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026