SRI BALAGOPALAN JEWELLERYMART,SOUTH AVANI MOOLA STREET, MADURAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIR 3(3) CHENNAI, INVESTIGATION BUILDING, CHENNAI

ITA 3903/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2026AY 2019-20208 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals arose from additions made by the Assessing Officer based on data retrieved from a pen drive during a search at another entity. The AO inferred unaccounted cash purchases from the other entity, leading to additions to the assessee's income. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions.

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that findings in the assessment of one person are not conclusive for another. In the absence of independent corroborative evidence, additions cannot be made based solely on material gathered from a third party's assessment.

What were the issues?

Whether additions can be made to an assessee's income based on data found during a search at another entity without independent corroborative evidence. Whether the presumption under Section 132(4A) applies to persons other than the searched person.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 153C,Section 250,Section 270

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI BENCHES, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE INTURI RAMA RAO & HON’BLE MANU KUMAR GIRI

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

These four appeals filed by the Assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal), Chennai-20, all dated 06.10.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and penalty order

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,286 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →