DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years without fulfilling the conditions of the first proviso to Section 147 are invalid. Since the AO did not prove any failure by the assessee to disclose material facts, the reassessment was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's reassessment proceedings were initiated beyond the four-year period from the end of the assessment year. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to demonstrate any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts fully and truly.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years are valid when the assessee has not failed to disclose material facts. Whether the AO's reasons for reopening were legally sustainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “DB”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM: The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 03.03.2026 for the assessment year 2012-13 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The contention in law as assailed by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee was that reassessment framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) by the ACI
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026