GANGA DEVI,RANCHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, acknowledging the assessee's lack of knowledge and the potential for justice. The assessee was directed to appear before the Assessing Officer to explain her case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a housewife with no prior income tax filing experience, faced reassessment proceedings for AY 2020-21. The Assessing Officer made additions under Sections 69A and 56(2)(x) after the assessee failed to provide explanations.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the dismissal of the assessee's appeal by the CIT(A) on grounds of delay, without considering the merits or the assessee's circumstances. The Tribunal also considered procedural issues related to faceless proceedings and natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148A,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 147,Section 56(2)(X),Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY & SMT. RAJANI GUDURI
PER: BENCH
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 26/11/2025 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
That the Order of the Learned CIT(A) is bad in law and in facts and the Order dismissing the appeal solely on Technical Grounds of delay in filing the appeal, without appreciating the merits of the case, and without appreciating that the assessee is a simple housewife with no income and never ever filed any Income Tax Return and having no knowledge
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026