UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY,SINDOOR HAZARIBAGH vs. ASSESMENT OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD HZB
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the appeal was not adjudicated on merits by the CIT(A) due to delay. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh after providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an engineering college, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer made additions on account of fees received and interest earned, stating the assessee failed to furnish documentary evidence and maintain books of account. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed on grounds of delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) and whether the additions made by the Assessing Officer are justified. The issue of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was also a preliminary consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69A,Section 69,Section 56,Section 148,Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY & SMT. RAJANI GUDURI
PER: BENCH
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 09/01/2026 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: "Exemption u/s 10(23c) (iiiab) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. University College of Engineering and Technology (UCET), Hazaribagh, is a government engineering college at Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). It was established in the year 2009. It is directly managed by the State Government's University "Vinoba Bhave University" (
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026