RUBY KUMARI,BHAGALPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT, CC-3, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing the principle of natural justice and the need to provide the assessee with another opportunity. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(Appeals) for disposal on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT with significant delays, citing personal hardship due to her husband's custody and the subsequent inability to manage tax proceedings. The CIT(Appeals) had dismissed the appeals ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned due to personal hardship and whether the ex-parte dismissal by the CIT(Appeals) was justified.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (6 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ITA No. 395/PAT/2026 (A.Y. 2013-14) ITA No. 399/PAT/2026 (A.Y. 2016-17) Ruby Kumari IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, DB, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No. 395, 397, 398, 399 & 400/PAT/2026 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 14-15, 15-16, 16-17 & 2017-18 Ruby Kumari,………………………………………..Appellant Hanumanpath, Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur-812001, Bihar [PAN:AVPPK6249R] -Vs.- Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,………………………………………..…………...Respondent Central Circle-3, Patna, Central Revenue Building, Patna-800001, Bihar & Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Ruby Kumari,………………………………………..Appellant Hanumanpath, Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur-812001, Bihar [PAN:AVPPK6249R] -Vs.- Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,……………………………………………………..Respondent
1 ITA No. 398/PAT/2026 (A.Y. 2015-16) Ruby Kumari Central Circle-2, Patna, Central Revenue Building, Patna-800001, Bihar Appearances by: Shri Sannigrahi Sudipta, A.R., appeared on behalf of the asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026