BLACK PEARL REALITIES,CHANDRAPUR vs. DCIT/ ACIT CENCIR 2(2) NAGPUR, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the material relied upon was the outcome of search proceedings initiated before April 1, 2021, the AO should have invoked Section 153C instead of Section 147. Consequently, the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 was invalid.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessee's cases under Section 147 based on information received during search proceedings in another person's case. The AO alleged escapement of income due to a discrepancy between the sale deed consideration and the agreement to sell for an immovable property.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO correctly assumed jurisdiction under Section 147 when the assessment was based on search material obtained prior to April 1, 2021, or if Section 153C was the appropriate provision.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These appeals preferred by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-3, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the FAA’ for short) in appeals filed
P a g e | 2 ITA Nos. 449 & 506/Nag/2026 Black Pearl Realities (AYs: 2018-19 & 2019-20) before him against the orders of the ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short) passed u/s 147 of the Income-ta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026