VIBRANT GLOBAL CAPITAL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer must independently establish concealment of income, even if the assessment order is accepted. The addition was based solely on inferences from an excel sheet without corroborative evidence, and the assessee's explanation was not adequately rebutted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was subject to assessment proceedings under Section 153C following a search operation. An addition was made under Section 69A based on an excel sheet suggesting undisclosed interest income. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were initiated for concealment of income.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be levied solely based on inferences from an excel sheet without independent corroboration and rebuttal of the assessee's explanation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.10.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-3, Nagpur (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. „The FAA‟) in DIN & Order No: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1081702932(1)
P a g e | 2 Vibrant Global Capital Limited (AYs: 2015-16) arising out of the penalty order dated 27.03.2022 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) passed by ACIT, Central Circle -1(2), Nagpur, for AY: 2015-16. 2. On hearing both
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026