GANESH KAMLKISHORE NIMODIYA,YAVATMAL vs. ITO WARD 1, YAVATMAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 was vitiated because the assessment should have been initiated under Section 153C, given the reliance on materials found during a search in another entity. The defect was considered non-curable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 147 based on information from a search in another entity, indicating the assessee maintained a bank account with them. The assessee failed to appear, leading to an addition under Section 69A. The assessee contended that Section 153C should have been invoked instead of Section 147.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid when the information originated from a search in another entity, or if Section 153C was the appropriate provision to invoke.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These appeals preferred by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the FAA’ for short) in appeals filed before him against the orders of the ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short) passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 read with P a g e | 2 ITA Nos. 130 & 131/Nag/2025 Ganesh Kamalkishore Nimodiya (AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17) section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (here
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026