M/S. WESTERN COALFILEDS LTD. NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. AASESSING OFFICER , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Mine Closure Expenses constituted a crystallized liability, supported by judicial precedents from the jurisdictional High Court and other benches. The reopening was also found to be based on a change of opinion without fresh tangible evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 401 crores for Mine Closure Expenses, which was allowed in regular assessment. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment after 4 years, disallowing the claim on the basis that it was an unascertained liability. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the provision for Mine Closure Expenses is an allowable business deduction and whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
PER KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 20/03/2023 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) which is emanating from the assessment order dated 09.09.2021 passed u/s. 147 of the Act for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14. 2. Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1) The notice issued u/s 148 of I.T. Act 1961 is illegal, invalid and bad in law. Consequent assessment framed thereupon is bad in law and is liable to be cancelled. 2) The learned CIT(A) ought to have held that notice u/s 148 of I.T. Act 1961 is not in accordance with law and consequent assessment framed thereupon is requi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026