SITHA MAHALAKSHMI KATAMANENI,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA
What were the facts?
The assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement where she received eight flats in exchange for her land. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment to tax capital gains, using the developer's construction cost as the full value of consideration. The assessee argued for using the Fair Market Value (FMV) as on the date of the agreement.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO erred in adopting the developer's construction cost as the full value of consideration. It ruled that the FMV as on the date of transfer, or as per Section 50D and the analogy of Section 45(5A), should be considered, aligning with the assessee's computation.
What were the issues?
Whether the cost of construction incurred by a developer over multiple years can be considered the full value of consideration for capital gains in the year of agreement, and whether FMV as on the date of transfer is the appropriate basis.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 48,Section 50D,Section 45(5A),Section 2(47)(v),Section 53A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE
PER MANJUNATHA G, AM: This appeal is filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-3 [hereinafter in short “Ld. CIT(A)”] vide DIN: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1085992795(1) dated 13.02.2026 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. ITA 226/VIZ/2026 SITHA MAHALAKSHMI KATAMANENI
The Assessee has rais
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Legend Distilleries PVT. LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Scottmen Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilieries PVT LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026