DAWOODI BOHRA MASJID-VERAVAL,VERAVAL vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and restored the matter to the CIT(Exemption). The CIT(Exemption) is directed to re-examine the application after providing an opportunity to the assessee to submit all necessary documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, but the application was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for non-submission of supporting documents. The assessee sought another opportunity to furnish these documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration application without granting adequate opportunity for document submission. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजकोट �यायपीठ, राजकोट। In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Accountant Member And Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 31/Rjt/2026 (�नधा�रणवष�/Assessment Year: (2023-24) Dawoodi Bohra Masjid-Veraval CIT(Exemption) Veraval City Dowoodi Bohra. Room No:609, Floor-6, Vs. Veraval Gir Somnath, Veraval Aayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Gujarat 362265 Nr: Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Anandnagar- Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad Gujarat 380015 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADTD7807M (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Darshak Thakkar, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Abiram Kartikeyan, Ld. CIT. DR Date of Hearing : 24/06/2026 30/06/2026 Date of Pronouncement : ORDER Per, Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) relating to rejection of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application seeking registration under clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of Section 12A
ITA No.31/Rjt/2026 [ AY 2023-24 ] Dawoodi Bohra Masjid-Veraval
of the Act. The application filed by the assessee was rejected due to non- submission of supporting documents such as copies of bank statements, identity proof of managing trustee and other relevant documents as called for by the learned CIT (Exemption). 3. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT (A) assessee is in appeal before this tribunal. At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the application was rejected due to inability of the assessee to furnish the supporting documents before the learned CIT (Exemption). It was further submitted that if another opportunity is granted, the assessee shall furnish all necessary supporting documents and substantiate its claim before the learned CIT (Exemption) without fail. 4. We also notice that there is a delay of 894 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. A petition for condonation of delay along with an affidavit/application explaining the reasons for such delay has been filed by the assessee. We, after considering the submissions and the material available on record, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the assessee and accordingly condone the delay in filing the appeal. 5. We, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we restore the matter to the file of the learned CIT (Exemption) with a direction to examine the issue afresh after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee and after considering all supporting documents that may be furnished by the assessee. 6. The assessee is directed to extend full cooperation and furnish all relevant documents before the learned CIT (Exemption).
Page 2 of 3
ITA No.31/Rjt/2026 [ AY 2023-24 ] Dawoodi Bohra Masjid-Veraval
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open Court on 30/06/2026.
Sd/- Sd/-
[ Dr. Arjun Lal Saini ] [ Shri Sonjoy Sarma ] लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member �याियक सद�य/Judicial Member S राजकोट/Rajkot िदनांक/ Date: 30/06/2026 Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The assessee 2. The Respondent 3. CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Rajkot 6. Guard File By order
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Rajkot
Page 3 of 3
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dikshant Nim vs. Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Pankaj Patil vs. Branch Manager Hdfc BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Rudra Pratap Singh vs. The Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026