NEHA GUPTA,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 14(3), DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the NFAC for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The NFAC was directed to consider the assessee's submissions and pass a speaking order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the NFAC was decided ex parte without securing the assessee's presence or obtaining their written submissions. The NFAC proceeded to hear the appeal on merits despite this.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC erred in deciding an appeal ex parte without providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 6077/Del/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Neha Gupta, Vs. ITO 5/4 Rohtak Road Jaidev Ward-14(3) Park, New Delhi Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AHDPG5872C
Assessee by : Shri Pranshu Singhal , CA Shri Rahul Bhardwaj, Ca Revenue by: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 24/03/2026 Date of pronouncement 26/05/2026
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, AM 1. The appeal in ITA No.6077/Del/2025 for AY 2014-15, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 04.07.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 25.05.2023 by the Assessing Officer, NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
On going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without securing the presence of the assessee. Eventhough
ITA No. 6077/Del/2025 Neha Gupta
the appeal has been decided by the ld NFAC on merits, it is a fact that the same was heard without hearing the assessee and without obtaining the written submissions of the assessee. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay, we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. The ld NFAC is also directed to consider the written submissions of the assessee and pass a speaking order uninfluenced by earlier decision taken and decide the appeal in accordance with law. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26/05/2026.
-Sd/- -Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (M. BALAGANESH) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 26/05/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026