BILQUIS BANO,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMSHEDPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148A was invalid as it did not provide the statutory 7 days' time for compliance. Consequently, the assessment order based on this invalid notice was also quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that the notice issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act did not provide the mandatory 7 days' compliance time.
What were the issues?
Whether a notice issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act is invalid if it fails to provide the statutory 7 days' compliance period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per Bench: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, DELHI [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal no. NFAC/2017-18/10346401 dated 12.06.2025 for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. Shri Akshay Ringasia, AR represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
At the outset, the ld. AR drew our attention to the notice issued u/s 148A of the Act dated 15.03.2022 and date of compliance was fixed on 22.03.2022, which is mentioned in the order u/s 148A(d) issued by ITO, Ward-1(1), Jamshedpur, which reads as under:
2
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026