KRISHNENDU SARKAR,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 1(3) GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI
What were the facts?
The assessee received compensation under the BSNL VRS-2019 scheme and inadvertently offered it to tax due to lack of awareness of the exemption available under Section 10(10B). The assessee later became aware of this exemption through a favorable ITAT judgment.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) for the BSNL VRS-2019 compensation, even if not claimed in the original return, following CBDT circulars and a precedent.
What were the issues?
Whether compensation received under BSNL VRS-2019 is exempt under Section 10(10B) and if exemption can be granted even if not claimed in the original return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH, GUWAHATI (VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA) SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2021-22
Kanauj Kanti Chaudhuri, Vs. ITO, Ward – 1, Kamalgazi, Merujeen Housing Income Tax Office, Complex, Flat No. AI-301, Tarapur, PWD Road, Narendrapur, South 24, Ambikapatty, Silchar Parganas, Kolkata - 700103 (Assam) - 788001 [PAN: ABMPC1336Q] APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Sandeep Dey, CA Revenue by : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. CIT Shri M.C.Omi Mingshen, CIT-DR
ITA Nos. 305 & 306/GTY/2026 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22 C/o Padvekar Law Chambers, Ward 1(1), Guwahati, 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3,21, Aayakar Bhawan, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - Christian Basti, G.S. 400020 Road, Guwahati - [PAN: ABSPT8907G] 781005
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
2 ITA Nos. 258, 262-265, 305-306 & 212-249/GTY/2026 ITA Nos. 242 & 243/GTY/2026 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22 C/o Padvekar Law Chambers, Ward 1(3), Guwahati, 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3,21, Aayakar Bhawan, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - Christian Bast
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026