KUKREJA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,GANDHINAGAR, JAMMU vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JAMMU, EXEMPTION WARD, JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Commissioner's rejection was bad in law due to a subsequent amendment in the Finance Act, 2024, which allowed entities that had commenced activities to file applications at any time. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to treat the application as filed within the statutory time and verify eligibility.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Kukreja Charitable Foundation, applied for registration under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner rejected the application, stating it was filed beyond the prescribed time limit based on the provisional approval period.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for 80G registration was time-barred considering the amendments to Section 80G(5) and the commencement of the assessee's activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH “DB”, AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
PER Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order u/s. 80G, dt. 05-02-2025, rejecting the assessee’s applicable for granting registration u/s. 80G(5) of the Act passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Chandigarh [Ld.CIT(E)].
We have heard both the parties and perused the records. In this case, assessee had filed an applicable for registration u/s. 80G(5) of the Act on 25-09-2024. Ld.CIT(E) issued notice and the assessee filed reply along with the documents asked by the Ld.CIT(E). In this case, it is an admitted fact that the assessee was granted provisional approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act on 21-10-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026