MANN MEDICITI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,MANN MEDICITI WELLNESS CENTRE PVT LTD. KHAMBRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, noting the assessee's grievance about not being granted a proper hearing and the need for further examination of evidence, remanded the matter back to the CIT (Exemption). The CIT is to provide the assessee one more opportunity to present its case and supporting documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a company incorporated in 2021, applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) to carry out charitable activities. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application, finding the assessee's home care services to be commercial in nature due to significant surplus generation and lack of evidence of charitable intent.
What were the issues?
Whether the activities of the assessee, providing home care services, are charitable or commercial in nature, and whether adequate opportunity for hearing was provided to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT (E), Chandigarh, dated 16/12/2024, rejecting the application for registration dated 30/06/2024, filed by the assessee in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act 61 ( henceforth the Act ).
The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form 36 are as follows:
“1. That the CIT (Exemption) was not justified in not granting registration u/s 12AA of the Act without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case. The detailed submissions made have not been appreciated. Assessment Year: 2022-23 2
That the CIT Exemption was not justified in treating the activi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026