BIHAR LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,PATNA vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed the order without hearing the assessee and without deciding all grounds of appeal on merits. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte without providing an opportunity to be heard. The assessee contended that this violated principles of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred by dismissing the appeal ex-parte without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, thereby violating principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 02.01.2026 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 04.02.2025 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 04.02.2025, Assessee filed an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. Bihar Livestock Development Agency; A.Y: 2020-21 CIT(A) vide Order dated 02.01.2026, dismissed the Appeal of the Assessee. As ag
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026