RANJEET KUMAR ,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 5(1), PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that both the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) orders were ex-parte, and the CIT(A) did not decide all grounds on merit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the NFAC, Delhi, after an ex-parte assessment order was passed by the Assessing Officer. The assessee contended that both orders were ex-parte and natural justice principles were violated.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte orders passed by the lower authorities violated principles of natural justice and if the CIT(A) adequately adjudicated all grounds of appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 10.12.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 03.02.2025 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 03.02.2025, Assessee filed an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. Ranjeet Kumar; A.Y: 2020-21 CIT(A) vide Order dated 10.12.2025, dismissed the Appeal of the Assessee. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026