DHEERAJ VAIDYA,INDORE vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1) IND, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the donation was not disclosed to the Election Commission as required by law, and the assessee failed to provide cogent material to rebut the findings of the lower authorities. The Tribunal also noted the suspicious nature of the donation to a party in another state.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 80GGC for a donation to Rashtriya Samajwadi Party (Secular). This donation was found to be part of a larger scam involving bogus donations to political parties for claiming deductions, with funds being returned to donors after deducting a commission.
What were the issues?
Whether the donation claimed as deduction under Section 80GGC was genuine, and whether the assessee had complied with the disclosure requirements under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80GGC,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 139,Section 148A,Section 132,Section 131(1A),Section 13A,Section 29C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second appeal .The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing No:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079635013(1)
dated 14.08.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned
order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2019-20 and the DHEERAJ VAIDYA ITA No. 892/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2019-20 corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2019. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an Assessment ord
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80GGC
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mazharkhan Nasrullahkhan Pathan, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 2342/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026