VINOD SHARMA,INDORE vs. ITO WARD 5(4), INDORE, INDORE

ITA 530/IND/2025Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 June 2026AY 2017-1815 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found the impugned order to be ex-parte and not on merits. Both the assessee and revenue agreed to remand the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's income was assessed at Rs. 92,67,470/-, with an addition of Rs. 90,00,000/- as unexplained money during the demonetization period. The assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations or evidence for the cash deposits.

What were the issues?

Whether the addition of Rs. 90,00,000/- as unexplained money was justified, and if the CIT(A)'s order was passed on merits or ex-parte.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 253

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

For Respondent: Shri Vipul Chavda, Sr.DR
Hearing: 12.06.2026Pronounced: 30.06.2026

Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M:

This is an appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ hereinafter referred to as the Act

for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal, as & by way of a second appeal .The Assessee is aggrieved by the order

bearing No:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074406373(1)

dated 12.03.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned

order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2017-18 and the VINOD SHARMA ITA No. 530/Ind/2025 - A.Y. 2017-18

corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2016 to 31.03.2017

2.

Factual Matrix

2.

1 That as and by way of an Assessment order made u/s 143(3) of the Act, the total income of

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 69A

All 15,297 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →