KISHORE GUPTA,ARERA COLONY vs. ACIT-1(2), HOSHANGABAD ROAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted the addition on account of jewellery, citing CBDT circulars and customary practices regarding 'Stridhan'. The addition for a small amount of cash found at the residence was also deleted as meagre. However, the addition for cash found in the locker was sustained due to lack of plausible explanation.
What were the facts?
During a search and seizure operation, cash and jewellery were found at the assessee's residence and lockers. The Assessing Officer made additions for undisclosed investment in jewellery and unexplained cash.
What were the issues?
Whether the jewellery found during the search constitutes undisclosed investment and whether the cash found is unexplained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 253,Section 271AAA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
Per Paresh M. Joshi, JM:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearingNumber:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-
26/1083014322(1) dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Ld.
Kishore Gupta CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act [National Faceless Appeal Centre
(NFAC)], which is hereinafter referred as the “impugned
order”. The relevant assessment is 2011-12 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as & by way of an assessment order made u/s 153A
r.w.s. 143(3) of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026