M/S. PASSION INFRAPROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,KANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the amendment to Section 68 regarding source of source was prospective, proving the creditworthiness of lenders was always necessary. Since crucial additional evidence was presented, the matters were restored to the AO for de novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessees, sister companies, had unsecured loans credited to their accounts. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on the belief that the creditworthiness of the lenders was not established. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeals, confirming some additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessees sufficiently proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the lenders for unsecured loans, and if additional evidence should be admitted and considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 143(3),Section 133(6),Section 133A,Section 132(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW ‘A’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: These two appeals have been filed by the assessees, which are sister companies, against the separate orders passed by the ld. CIT(A)-4, Kanpur under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 19.07.2018, wherein the ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeals of the assessee against the orders A.Y. 2013-14 M/s Passion Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd. M/s Passion Infrapromoters Pvt.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026