ASGARALI BAHDURALI BHIMANI,BHAVNAGAR vs. ITO-WARD-1(8), BHAVNAGAR, BHAVNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not properly appreciated the documents and evidence submitted by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order confirming additions for unexplained expenditure was heard. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal without properly appreciating the documents submitted by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly appreciated the evidence submitted by the assessee and whether the additions for unexplained expenditure were justified without proper verification and opportunity for cross-examination.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 3. 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, True Copy
सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, , अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad , ,
Date of dictation 08.06.2026 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 10.06.2026 3. Other Member 11.06.2026 4. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S 11.06.2026 5. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement 30.06.26 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S 30 .06.2026 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 30 .06.2026 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………………………………... 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order 10. Date of Dispatch of the Order……………………………………
More judgments on Section 69C
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sonu Jain, Agra vs ITO WD(1)(1)(2), AgraITA 671/AGR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mritunjay Singh, Kudra vs AO, SasaramITA 454/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Shantilal Mafaji Kachchhava, Banaskantha vs ITO WD 1 Palanpur, PalanpurITA 2256/AHD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Madhusudhan Gade, Nizamabad vs ITO., Ward-1, NizamabadITA 379/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026